Free GEO tools

Free GEO tools for AI search readiness

Run one free scan and get the diagnostics that matter before you spend on AI search software: crawler access, rendered content, metadata, structured data, crawl files, and answerability.

Scan your site first

Paste a URL and get the free report. The scan checks the same on-site signals that usually decide whether an AI crawler can fetch, parse, and reuse your page.

Compare free tools

Free AI search, AEO, and GEO scan. No signup or card needed.

Included diagnostics

One free scan, six practical checks

Most teams do not need another dashboard at the start. They need to know what the page looks like to crawlers and which source file or crawl rule is likely causing the issue.

  • AI search readiness checkup

    Available now

    Scores a public URL across 23 checks and returns a report with pass, partial, and fail evidence.

    • 0 to 100 readiness score
    • Route-level evidence
    • No signup
  • AI crawler access check

    Included

    Checks whether important AI and search crawlers can reach the site without blocked robots rules or missing crawl files.

    • robots.txt
    • sitemap.xml
    • AI crawler allow rules
  • Raw HTML visibility check

    Included

    Looks at the server response before browser JavaScript runs, because AI crawlers need fetchable text.

    • Server-rendered body text
    • Visible headings
    • Hydration gaps
  • Metadata and schema check

    Included

    Reviews titles, descriptions, canonicals, social metadata, and JSON-LD so machines can identify the page cleanly.

    • Metadata
    • Open Graph
    • Structured data
  • llms.txt and sitemap check

    Included

    Checks whether crawlers and AI systems have a clean route map for the pages you want them to understand.

    • llms.txt
    • Markdown twins
    • Sitemap coverage
  • Answerability check

    Included

    Flags pages that talk around the answer instead of defining the topic in clear, quotable language.

    • Answer-first sections
    • FAQ structure
    • Sourceable claims

How to choose

Pick the tool by the job

Free GEO tools are useful when the result is specific. Start broad, then switch to implementation once the report shows a code or crawl blocker.

You need a quick score

Use a free audit or score checker to understand whether the page is crawlable and structured enough for AI search.

You need technical evidence

Look for raw HTML, robots, sitemap, metadata, schema, and heading evidence. A vague visibility score is not enough for an engineer.

You need the site changed

Pick a workflow that turns the scan into a pull request. Most free tools stop at the report.

Fix path

When the audit finds a blocker, ship a fix

A low score is only useful if someone can turn it into a change. GEO Repair is built for that handoff: scan, evidence, sandboxed edit, reviewable pull request, re-check.

FAQ

Free GEO tools FAQ

Plain answers about what the free scan can measure, what it cannot promise, and when a fix workflow matters.

Are these GEO tools free?

Yes. The AI search readiness checkup is free, does not require signup, and returns the diagnostic report for the URL you scan. Paid work starts only if you choose to connect a repository and ask the agent to open fix pull requests.

Is this a rank tracker?

No. GEO Repair checks whether your site is technically ready for AI search engines to fetch, parse, and quote. Rank trackers and visibility monitors measure whether brands appear in AI answers. Both are useful, but they answer different questions.

Can a free GEO tool guarantee ChatGPT citations?

No. A tool can remove on-site blockers, but it cannot force ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, or Google AI Overviews to cite a page. GEO Repair measures readiness and fixes technical issues without promising rankings, citations, or traffic.

What makes GEO Repair different from a normal audit tool?

The free scan shows the issue and the evidence. The paid fix path can then change the site in a sandbox and open a reviewable pull request. That matters when the problem is code, rendering, metadata, schema, or crawl files.